Category Archives: Iran

Navigating the Rapids: Questions for Intercession and Conversation

As I compose this essay, polarizing cultural and political leaders continue their venomous attacks against their opponents. Labels of “Nazi” have become a comma in discourse and vulgarity is now a sign of transparency. Invading church services is now heralded as civil rights agitation and any critique of radical Islam is suppressed as a phobia. 

Antisemitism continues metastasizing, with deceptive voices claiming only opposition to Zionism while not hating Jews. European nations are divided between nationalists with closed borders and globalists in a freefall capitulation to external powers or Islamicists. Crowds are chanting against the USA and ignoring the real injustices in Iran as thousands rise up against a truly evil regime. 

I have paused my commentaries for several months so that when I write, it is not one more reactive piece only exacerbating the divisions. In addition to all these external issues, we find people of faith divided over their responses to events, with some MAGA activists wrapping the Cross in a flag and those infused with hatred toward President Trump refusing support for any administration policies. 

As a Christian devoted to Christ’s kingdom and wise participation in society, I offer the following thoughts as a stimulus for reflection and civil conversation. Even in my most passionate moments, I will not:

  • Label or libel individuals and deny the humanity of any person.
  • Categorize all who disagree with me as “the enemy.” 
  • Stop believing that there is hope when people of conscience work together. 

As a public intellectual, I will:

  • Affirm that truth can be discovered and narratives can change.
  • Affirm that there are first principles of ethics and morality essential for a free and virtuous society. 
  • Seek principled consensus and live peaceably with people who see the universe differently. 

In the spirit of Jesus of Nazareth and Socrates, Here are some questions for conversation and prayer.

Question One: What does a secure border and reasonable immigration reform look like, so America is hospitable and wise?

Most Americans want border security, deportation of serious criminals, and pathways for citizenship and legal work status for people ready to contribute to our country. They are happy with some current policies and prefer surgical arrests to sweeping actions. The problem is that the paid-for-protestors and radicals on the Left want open borders and less rule of law. The Mayor of Boston recently said that everyone has a right to come to the US and have a job. On the Right, finding moderation is hard when any adjustments are seen as compromise. Some want a fortress with no hospitality. The key here? Congress finding courage and working for real immigration reform. 

Question Two: How can detractors and supporters of President Trump find a way to discuss issues rather than react to a personality?  

President Trump’s arrogance and self-promotion undermine what might be prudent domestic and foreign policies. If he will stop insulting and litigating against opponents and focus on cultivating consensual action, more peaceful progress is possible. At the same time the haters of Trump do not understand his deal-making proclivities. Greenland was never going to be an American state or territory. Several truces around the world are positive steps away from violence; however, there is much more work needed securing enduring peace. 

Question Three: Is there a real pathway to peace in the Middle East?

Israel is not a Western “settler-colony” imposing her will on a peaceful Palestine. The Jihadists opposing Israel want her absolute destruction and the end of all Jewish presence in the world. Some historical facts:

  • The international community has affirmed the need for a Jewish national home in her ancient land from the end of WWI. The convulsions following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire led to the rise of Arab nationalist and jihadist movements, all of whom opposed any Jewish presence. 
  • The Holocaust killed over six million Jews. In response, leaders and nations rallied around a modest homeland for the Jews in the Holy Land. The UN partitioned Palestinian territory in 1947, designation areas for Jewish settlement and the Palestinian state of Trans Jordan. No Arab nation would affirm the right of these survivors to a state in their ancient home. War ensued in 1948, with the armies of six nations arrayed against a small force. JORDAN invaded the West Bank and secured all of Jerusalem, in violation of UN mandates. A truce (NOT a treaty) came in 1949. Israel’s quick victory in 1967 secured her existence and began decades of peace talks. The Camp David Accords of 1978 saw Egypt secure the Sinai and make peace. Jordan stopped her overt hostility and a framework for the future was established.
  • From the 1970s to the mid-2010s, Israel has offered a joint capital in Jerusalem and over 90% of her reclaimed territory in the Judea and Samaria for peace. She left Gaza in 2005, only to see Hamas take a beautiful region and turn into a terrorist state. Finally, Israel is the only working (and contentious) democracy in the region, with over two million Arab citizens and equal rights for all minorities and religious communities. 

Question Four: Is there a way forward for a liberated Iran?

The great Persian people deserve a democratic society. With freedom of conscience/religion, equal rights for all, and opportunities for economic and social flourishing. The current totalitarian regime is violently suppressing dissent. The US is supportive of regime change from within and offering strong military presence that can be targeted toward regime leaders and military targets. This is an opportunity for people of conscience in both American parties to unite. The barrier is that some of the people and parties that oppose President Trump are stuck in their red-green alliance and refuse to support change because it is neither Islamist nor Marxist. Some are silent because they cannot support any administrative initiative. On the right, Fortress America opponents of any intervention rail against engagement. The way forward is steady support for dissidents, further sanctions, and a refusal to accept the apocalyptic regime as it is. 

The above are just a few of the contentious issues. The world is complicated. Friends, let’s reflect before we react, pray for those that oppose us the most, and offer workable solutions creating pathways for all to flourish. In my next essay, I will offer questions/thoughts on human identity, public ethics, and economic wisdom. We can build a better future once we stop shouting and start listening. 

Truth is the Only Path to Peace

The “Arab Spring” has devolved into the Jihadi Winter. The Cairo 2009 strategy of “leading from behind” and “outreach” to radical Islamic regimes is bearing bitter fruit and global contempt for the USA. “Negotiations” between the Palestinians are interrupted by terrorist attacks on Israelis, continued calls for violence and a refusal of the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel’s right to exist within secure borders and with full diplomatic relations with a second Palestinian state (Jordan was shaped as the first one in 1947). When Israel defends herself or builds a few settlements, the world declares “Apartheid! Racism! Colonialism!” And those are the nice words.

It is time for honesty about USA foreign policy and the realities of the Middle East. Millions of lives, scores of national economies and our pursuit of justice demand serious accounting, not ideological epithets tossed back and forth on the airwaves and Internet. In the following paragraphs, I will outline a pathway to peace, with the understanding that any accord is fragile and the cohesion of nation-states and tranquility between nations requires ethical courage and constant vigilance. I will not cater to radical Zionists that wish to displace all Arabs from Judea and Samaria. I will also refuse to listen to replacement theologians and leftist activists that reduce Israel to Western colonialism and deny her place in the community of nations.

There are multiple 20th century narratives concerning the Middle East, from the miracle of Zionism to the tragedy to Palestinian diaspora. All of them contain some truth and no one timeline (with its inherent selectivity) can capture the complexity. The pathway to peace requires understanding history and a willingness to lay down the grievances of the past to forge a better future. Recounting terrorist incidents and family tragedies without forgiveness and willingness to create something new only compounds the current impasse. The way forward is rooted in present reality and future hope, not bitterness or nostalgia.

Here are some “mile markers” on a road to peace:

1. Israel is not going away. Much can be negotiated – and has, with Nobel prizes awarded for the attempts – but existence in peace with diplomatic relations is the starting point.

2. A Palestinian State dedicated to peace, economic cooperation and freedom of conscience must be the goal. There will be no new state without renunciation of terrorism. This new state is another “given.”

3. The Palestinian demands for “right of return” for 1947-49 refugees cannot include every distant descendant and must involve relocation in the new state as much as possible, not overwhelming a Jewish State with angry radicals. Realistically, many can return home in Israel, with others welcomed in a new Palestine.

4. Jerusalem can be the capital of both states. The Temple Mount and other holy sites need oversight from outside bodies as well and the consensus of each nation.

5. The new Palestinian leaders must renounce deception, winking at radicals and the long-term goal of annihilating Israel. There cannot be one set of phrases for Western consumption while other agendas are promoted to radical constituencies. No more Temple denial, Holocaust denial or distribution of the Protocols and other scurrilous literature.

6. Israel should freeze settlements if # 1 is unequivocally announced and terrorists are arrested and prosecuted.

7. There should be immediate economic joint-ventures creating thousands of new jobs for underemployed Palestinians.

8. The USA must be the leading mediator at serious peace talks. No other nation has anything close to the objectivity America displays. China wants oil, period. Russia wants imperial power and access to warm water and economic control. All the nations surrounding Israel have much to gain from peace, including the blessings of free trade, tourism and culture exchange. Iran and Syria can be marginalized and a new coalition of freedom-affirmation nations may be emboldened to resist the mad mullahs.

9. The EU needs to stay on the sidelines and enter a new season of humility and repentance for her anti-Semitism and capitulation to radical Islam. Without reverting to the national-racial depravities of the 19th and 20th century, European nations must reaffirm first principles of freedom and arrest their decline toward de facto Sharia. No European nation has the moral strength and objectivity at present to lend any weight to negotiations.

10. All of these principles for peace require unprecedented courage on the part of Israeli and Palestinian leaders. The PA must change their textbooks and include an Israeli State. Israel must welcome a fledgling state next door and create economic and travel pathways for prosperity. Before the ink is dry, death threats will come to all involved. But the lessons of Begin and Sadat are instructive. There has been no war between Israel and Egypt (or Jordan) since Camp David (President Carter’s greatest achievement). Bill Clinton called Arafat after the another broken accord and accused Arafat of ruining the chances fro pace and destroying their personal legacies. Arafat, child of the 1940s jihadi cries of the Mufti of Jerusalem (a joyful visitor to Auschwitz), could not, in the end, let go of his hatred and eliminationist ideology. Israel has proven her willingness to cede land for peace. It is time to find a PA leader who welcomes peace for generations yet unborn.

All peacemaking requires the best of human nature. All peace accords are subverted by human depravity. Israel is a moral good for the world. A peaceful Palestine could point the way toward Islamic cultural revitalization and political moderation. Real peace is a goal worth working for. May “open covenants, openly arrived at…” guide leaders that desire a better future.